EXAMPLE LESSON PLANS

following the PPP model

It is difficult to find a universally perfect lesson plan that would always be suitable for a certain level at a certain point in a course.  Some would argue that it is impossible.  Still, those classes which share a sufficient number of common characteristics in its profile can be given a similar lesson plan.  What makes the lesson plan stronger is how the teacher uses it while actually in the classroom.  The students and teacher together shape the form it takes on during its execution.  The lesson plan is an anticipation of the directions the teacher wants to take the class and how to go about it.

The lesson plans listed here are suggestions and models to serve in reaching other teachers to help their understanding and to stimulate & encourage them to produce their own versions, customized to reflect their particular experiences, perspectives and situations.  And the reader is reminded that the PPP model is only one of many possible approaches to teaching a language class.  Where a teacher has flexibility and interest, it is recommended to experiment and explore ideas that might contribute to a richer level of appreciation of the teaching/learning environment and one’s place in it.

A.     BEING FLEXIBLE IN YOUR LESSON PLANNING

Some considerations to keep in mind

On this page there are 8 examples of lesson plans you can look at, four of which have been previously presented.  If you compare them, you may notice some differences such as in LP2 (Lesson Plan 2) there are 3 Presentations, not one.  These differences are there to show you that you can apply the model with some flexibility, depending on your objectives.

Most of the examples focus on presenting grammar or vocabulary but LP3 is done differently because there is a stronger focus on the input (reading), so a PWP approach is used.  Just because you want to focus more on a reading or listening activity doesn’t mean you can’t have the students look at and use some grammatical structures or new vocabulary, but because that target language is of a lower priority and has less time and fewer activities surrounding it, the PWP model is used.  In either model you still want to get your students talking (and perhaps writing) about the theme and the input.

The Production activity in these examples has been for speaking, but writing could be another end to strive for, and you follow the same procedure (Context → Input → Presentation → Practice → Production) to get the students orientated and using the target language in the way defined in your objectives.  For example,
By the end of the class, the students will be able to organize their ideas and use some appropriate expressions in a formal letter requesting information about living in a campus residence for the next university year.

It has been emphasized a few times in this article that the PPP model can be useful in many ways, but the teacher is encouraged to modify it or use other approaches, depending on the situation and objectives.  Using a song in class might be presented in different ways, but both LP6 & LP7 suggest ways that could be theoretically followed using the PPP model.  LP6 focuses on vocabulary for its target language in a low or intermediate group and LP7 uses the same song but is used for an advanced level and to focus on one aspect of pronunciation (connected speech) rather than a grammar or vocabulary aim.

Sometimes teachers want to get their students speaking more.  This can be done in many ways but to demonstrate how this model might be applied, a clear objective is recommended and building the students up to that end constitutes the bulk of the class.  LP8 is one possible example of how that could be done.  What’s important to realize is that unless you have imposed limits placed on you, you have a great amount of freedom to create a lesson plan suitable for you and your students.  The PPP model offers you one way, and you can play with it to best reach your ends, or choose other approaches if they seem more worthwhile.

The format of these plans is done in a way to highlight how you can approach doing them with the PPP perspective.  If you are working for a school or some company that wishes you to submit your lesson plan, make sure you follow their recommended format, not the one presented here.  Also, official observations aside, you want to have a plan that is very user friendly TO YOU, so feel free to make any changes to the format that help you feel more comfortable designing the plan and later executing it in the classroom.

B.     PREVIOUSLY PRESENTED LESSON PLANS

Here are some links to lesson plans already presented in this article

Click on the number or description to have a look at the lesson plan.  Note that sometimes the lesson plan is part of a greater explanation, so you may want to have a look at what is written before or after the lesson plan.

Click on ‘Download’ below the description to have a look at the lesson plan.  Note that the first 3 lesson plans aren’t accompanied by materials.  They are simply examples and part of a greater explanation cited in the line below ‘Download’.

Lesson Plan 1 is from The PPP Model Explained, Section C which reviews the terminology and concepts previously presented.

Lesson Plan 2 is from The PPP Model Explained, Section D where the concepts are explored further, providing more details and insights on how the model can be used.

Lesson Plan 3 is from The PWP Model which compares how this model is similar and different to the PPP model.  The PWP model has a greater focus on reading or listening.

Lesson Plan 4 is the one used in teaching the class demonstrated in Class In Action.  This lesson plan has been more fully developed, complete with accompanying materials.  If you want to see any of them, click on ‘Download’ below the image:

Alternative options to lesson plan 4

A FEW FINAL WORDS:

It’s a good idea to include your intentions (objectives), what you expect the students to do (how you’re going about that) and what you as the teacher will be doing for different reasons.  When somebody other than the teacher is reading the lesson plan, it is not always clear how and why things are to be done in a certain way.  For that matter, it might not be clear to the teacher either, so it is a good exercise to get accustomed to including those extra details.  Sometimes a class goes over very well and the teacher wants to save the lesson plan to use with another class some time in the future.  A year later when you look at the plan again and are trying to interpret what to do and why it should be done, there may be some ideas lost or unclear because they weren’t spelled out in the original.

Two more tips for lesson planners:
1) If you’re having an official observation or have to fill out your lesson plan using a certain form, make another version for yourself that you can easily follow while you are actually teaching.  It might just be a series of big circled numbers listed on a page with a few notes jotted down to remind you what to do in which order.  Or it could be a power point presentation with detailed notes in the margins describing step be step what you want to say and do.  Whatever helps you feel comfortable and directed during the class should by the notes you follow while teaching.  And if there are official forms, then you can do them in the expected way to give to the proper people.

2) During or shortly after the class, make a few notes which reflect any insights or ideas that come to mind when executing the plan.  Maybe some issues came up, students had some good suggestions or you had an inspiration.  This can help you immensely if you want to repeat the plan with another class, or when you are thinking what to do in the next class.

C.     MORE EXAMPLES, THIS TIME WITH A CHALLENGE

You might like to see what kind of lesson plan you can come up with

Here are a few more examples.  You have two options.  One is to simply click on each example and have a look.
Another is to accept THE CHALLENGE.  This is an invitation for you to choose one or more situations and then try to write your own lesson plan corresponding to that situation.  When you are done, or have done as much as you care to, then compare your version with the one provided.  You can take on the challenge at any level you wish.  That might mean just having a few thoughts about how you might go about it, you could scratch out a minimal skeleton plan, or you could develop it further with some details.

When you compare your version with the given one, it’s important to remember that there is no final true ‘correct’ answer or perfect plan.  Two very experienced teachers could very easily come up with very different plans.  And a teacher with less experience would come up with what is within her/his current resources and perspectives, which would be appropriate for her/his situation.  When you encounter differences between the two versions (yours and the one here), look at them as different options and consider the benefits of each one.  This might stimulate more ideas on what you might be able to do in your classes.  Also keep in mind that how you imagined your class profile would be different in some ways to how another would do that, so it is possible that while the two plans would vary, they would each be appropriate to their respective imagined situation.

OPTION ONE:  So, if you want to simply view the examples, click on those that catch your eye.  You may want to have a look at Before You Start and A Few Thoughts as well.

OPTION TWO:  You want to try the challenge.
– Choose the situation (LP5, LP6, LP7 or LP8) you want to approach.
– Read the Before You Start for a little more orientation
– Think of how you would make your lesson plan and draft it out following the points in THE CHALLENGE
– Compare yours with the one provided and look for benefits in both plans.  Also check out A Few Thoughts.

1- Read the language focus and consider the level.  If it is for a lower level, it might be the first time you are introducing the grammar point, for example, or if you think the students have already been exposed to the target language, you would dedicate your class to clarifying some points and strengthening the students’ usage.  Different interpretations would lead to very different classes being taught.

2- Read Before You Start.

3- Complete the lesson plan by addressing each of the sections

It is not necessary to find any materials to use (listenings or articles, worksheets, etc), nor write out a lot of detailed ideas, unless you feel that helps you, but try not to overdo it.  Simply sketch out how you would interpret each section.  This includes saying what kind of input and describing it a little.  (For example, listening: three people at a meeting at work arguing about the location of the coffee machine.)  Briefly describe what each task or activity will be.  (For example, LISTENING FOR GIST: Students decide which of four topics the people at the meeting are discussing.)  Provide examples and details when it will add to clarity or help define what is being said.

4- Check out the provided lesson plan and compare how it is similar and different from yours.  See what you like from both plans and if this stimulates any good ideas or helps you become more familiar with lesson planning in this style.

5- If you do a few challenges like this, maybe come up with a PPP lesson plan you would like to try out in one of your classes.

Here are the lesson plan challenges for LP5 – LP8:

Write your lesson plan following the basic procedure described above in The Challenge, steps 1 – 5.

Remember to read Before You Start before writing your lesson plan.  When you’re done, read A Few Thoughts and check out the provided plan.

Before you start

Imagine you have to teach the difference between Past Simple and Present Perfect but you don’t like how it’s presented in the student book.  You begin thinking of different alternative ways to teach that class without using the material in the book.  You come across an interesting video which is an interview of a famous celebrity you think many of your students like.  How would you develop your lesson plan from here?

NOTE:  In this challenge there is a range of levels.  Choose one (elementary, pre-intermediate or intermediate) and base your lesson plan on that perspective.

A few thoughts

If it is the first time our students have seen the Present Perfect, it is quite likely that the Past Simple would not play a big role in that class.  If they have seen it before, but maybe only briefly in the previous course last year, then your class may not use the Past Simple much, either.  If the students have had some reasonable experience with the Present Perfect before, or you feel they are all capable of handling two verb tenses (the Present Perfect and the Past Simple), then the provided lesson plan is one way you could approach it.

The Present Perfect is used for different situations and sometimes the simple or the continuous form is more appropriate or correct.  It is best not to mix the different functions unless it is a review after the students have had some exposure to the different applications beforehand.

It’s important to monitor your students to see how they are coping with the information, to give them support and clear direction, as well as ample opportunities to practice and explore before attempting the Production activity.  By being observant on how well they are dealing with the Present Perfect, you can make better decisions on what needs more work and where to challenge them further.

Write your lesson plan following the basic procedure described above in The Challenge, steps 1 – 5.

Remember to read Before You Start before writing your lesson plan.  When you’re done, read A Few Thoughts and check out the provided plan.

Before you start

Your students requested a few songs to do in class and you decide that one of them could be possible to cover at that level.  Let’s imagine there are a couple good expressions in the chorus and a couple more in the rest of the song.  You feel that these expressions could be useful for the students to learn as the target language.  There are a few other words or expressions that would be helpful to learn as well, especially in understanding some important parts of the song, so these could be dealt with in the Introduction activity.  Try using the PPP model to write a lesson plan for this class.

A few thoughts

If you want to do part of your class working with a song and later perhaps using it to stimulate a speaking activity or two, the PPP model wouldn’t normally be your first option.  The PWP model would be easier to work with in this regard, for example.  Or if you just want to approach the song as a quick activity and not go through the whole process of following a complete model, it is still recommended to have a clear objective on how the song would work to help your students in some way.

If a strong part of the class was focussed on learning and using new vocabulary that comes from the song, the PPP model becomes a more viable option.  It is still not the only way to do things, but it is one possibility.  Have a look at how one interpretation might look.

Write your lesson plan following the basic procedure described above in The Challenge, steps 1 – 5.

Remember to read Before You Start before writing your lesson plan.  When you’re done, read A Few Thoughts and check out the provided plan.

Before you start

Imagine you think the same song you used for a lower level group would be fun for your advanced class.  Obviously you wouldn’t have the students do the exact same thing because their needs are different.  You think that it is time for that group of students to work on their pronunciation more.  The suggestion is to focus on teaching connected speech following the PPP model, and that is the challenge set to you.  However, if you are new to teaching, then you may not be ready for this.  If that is the case, work on a different aspect of pronunciation (ex: word stress, sentence stress, consonant clusters, difficult sounds for your students).  That would be fine as long as it is appropriate for a high level.  Also remember that you want to keep the students involved in your Presentation, not to make it only or mostly you lecturing.  How would you go about it?

There are already several examples of activities and lesson plans focussing on grammar or vocabulary in this article.  I wanted to include something that is a little different, but could still fit into our look at lesson planning using the PPP model.  In this case the language focus will be on pronunciation.  Phonology is a language system, no less so than grammar or vocabulary, so it can very easily fit into the PPP model.  Let’s imagine that our advanced students have difficulty understanding people when they speak quickly or not very carefully.  Our students could also work on their own speaking skills, particularly in the area of relaxed speech where the sounds seem to merge together.  Just like grammar and vocabulary, there are some rules to guide the language learners, you can’t teach them all at once, or expect the student to master them in just one class.  In today’s class we are going to introduce the students to 3 aspects of connected speech.  These are three frequent ways sounds are changed when English is spoken in a relaxed manner as opposed to a very careful, even formal style.

A- some sounds change  ex:  Did you → Dijou   (the ‘d’ and the ‘y’ change to ‘j’)
B- some sounds disappear  ex:   Sit down → Sidown   (the ‘t’ disappears when next to a strong ‘d’)
C- some sounds join together in perhaps unexpected ways  ex: not at all → no ta tall  (consonants join vowels)

The lesson plan will deal with all three of the above changes occurring during connected speech, but if you prefer to focus on just one or two of them, then do so.  Before plotting out your lesson plan, it would be a good idea to determine what aspect of pronunciation you want to deal with, determine your objective(s), and decide what the theme for the class will be.  If we were not following the PPP model, we could be open to doing things differently, and that might be fine too.  However, it is still generally a very good idea to be clear on your objectives, no matter what model or approach you are considering.

NOTE:  There is a website that allows you to type out those symbols (and it’s good for languages other than English):   https://ipa.typeit.org/

This is another good site because it gives you many examples.  Keep in mind it’s in the British RP Pronunciation dialect. https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/phoneticsymbolsforenglish.htm

This site is basically the same as the previous one but has the American accent in mind:
https://koreatesol.org/sites/default/files/EClinic-%20Phonetic%20Symbols.pdf

This information will be repeated and placed in A Few Thoughts so it will be easy for you to copy and paste the links.
As you probably already know, there isn’t only one British accent or one American accent, but it has been decided that these versions are to be used as a standard reference.

A few thoughts

In choosing the input one would more frequently select something with a dialogue to capture ‘more natural’ patterns but pronunciation is basically an element of all forms of speaking, be they speeches or monologues, chanting, poetry reading, somebody talking to him or herself, speaking in different situations which involve different kinds of interactions and levels of formality, different accents and regional tendencies, and so on.  For fun we looked at ‘a song’; the same theoretical song which could be used for the low level class in LP6.  Of course you could use a different, more difficult song, or focus on the lyrics and/or grammar.  Some suggestions for that have already been given elsewhere in this presentation of the PPP model.

This lesson plan is a longer than the others because it is dealing with an area that many teachers feel reluctant to touch.  In my early years of teaching, I also wasn’t sure what to do with it, but now connected speech has become one of my favourite aspects of teaching.  It just takes some time to get familiar with what is involved, and some experimenting.  But it can be approached in a fun way and an interesting way.  When you first start out in your explorations, I recommend you limit them to just one or a few aspects.  Then when you feel more confident with those, add one or two more to your repertoire.

Another recommendation:  Sometimes you are teaching something new and there might be a lot of details that you feel important to include.  It depends a little too on how well you improvise, how well you remember and how nervous you get when in front of people.  If the subject matter is fairly new then you could do several things.  One thing is to go over the plan several times in your mind so you feel better prepared.  You could also have a more personalized lesson plan with a general outline telling you the major steps and an occasional prompt for something you may need reminding of.  Accompanying that general outline could be some kind of prompt or a more detailed description just for that section.  In the case of the Presentation, for example, you might want to have a separate paper with the phonemic script examples and symbols that you want to use.

And of course it is often a good idea to spread out complicated elements over several classes.  Focus on one or two ideas in one class so the students get familiar with using them.  Then build onto that in the following class.  You could do a review, maybe some further practice, and then add the next element or layer.

One last point.  Much depends on your objectives.  It’s good to keep in mind what you want to achieve and how you are considering going about it.  Using the PPP or the PWP model may not be the most advantageous option for a song, but it does depend on what you intend on doing.  Feel free to approach your goals in a variety of ways and decide on those that you feel have the benefits you are looking for.

Write your lesson plan following the basic procedure described above in The Challenge, steps 1 – 5.

Remember to read Before You Start before writing your lesson plan.  When you’re done, read A Few Thoughts and check out the provided plan.

Before you start

Imagine your students at an intermediate or upper intermediate level and you want to get them speaking in a richer manner, such as justifying their statements, giving examples, responding more to what other people are saying.  You think that it might be a good idea to teach them expressions that would be useful while engaging in a discussion or even an argument with someone.  And that idea evolves into deciding you want your students to have a debate.  The challenge is how can this all be translated into a strong lesson plan using the PPP model?

NOTE:  Functional language is the language used that surrounds a particular situation which involves doing some task.  For example:  ●giving directions;  ●speaking on the phone;  ●apologizing.  Frequently the target language is the use of expressions typical for those situations, but it can also involve some grammar.  In giving directions we do use some set phrases such as ‘go straight’, ‘turn left’, ‘you can’t miss it’, but we also use imperatives.  Functional language is often the theme for a chapter or part of a unit in a student book so after going through it, the students are more capable of functioning in that situation.

Remember that the PPP model is best designed for a language focus, not directly on skills development.  There is some skills work done in the Input stage where reading or listening does play a part, and speaking is encouraged throughout the lesson.  Speaking or writing is also part of the objective and the Production stage, but it is not the language focus.  Normally the language focus is grammar or vocabulary and functional language can work very nicely into this model.

Therefore, if you want your students to engage in a debate, that is fine, and if you approach it using the PPP model, you have to include some language focus.  Because engaging in a debate can be viewed as a function or a situation which often uses particular kinds of language, our target language could be one or more groups of expressions that would be useful in carrying out that speaking activity.  Just like giving directions or speaking on the phone, you could come up with some expressions that would be useful for the students to learn.  While having debates may not be situations taking place as frequently as giving directions or speaking on the phone, you could focus on expressions that could also be transferable to other useful situations like having arguments, discussions, or even exchanges of opinions in conversations.  There are two suggested areas of functional language for you to teach your students.
1- agreeing & disagreeing    (ex:  I agree with you up to a point.  You’ll have to come up with a few more examples to teach.)
2- introducing & emphasizing points   (This isn’t immediately clear to many teachers so a list is provided here.  These are ways to start the sentence you want to communicate that places some emphasis on it.  If you wish to make some changes to the list, that would be fine.)
     ●It cannot be denied that…
●What I think is…
●What I don’t understand is why (people think that) …
●One thing to consider is …
●I want to point out that …
●What I want to point out is
….

Complete the lesson plan by addressing each of the sections (context, input gist task, etc – introduction is optional).  It is not necessary to find any materials to use (listenings or articles, worksheets, etc), nor write out a lot of detailed ideas (unless you want to).  Simply sketch out how you would interpret each section.  In this case, because the target language consists of two different sets of expressions, think of how you are going to approach that.  Perhaps you would prefer each has their own Presentation and sets of Practice activities, for example.

Part of the challenge is dealing with two separate themes of functional language.  That is something you will have to make decisions on.  If you prefer something simpler, choose one of the two themes and develop your lesson plan around that.  Also, the suggestion is to have a debate for the Production activity.  It is also a possibility to change that into a discussion or a conversation of some kind, but consider the challenge of preparing your students to engage in a debate.  How would you set it up and get them acquainted with its structure?

A few thoughts

Now that you’ve done it, check yours with the version provided.  Remember that the following provided version is not the perfect standard to gauge yours by.  It is simply one version.  With the image and feel of the class you imagined, your lesson plan could be much more appropriate than the one offered here.  But do check it out after you have done yours, partly for curiosity’s sake, and partly to see if you can find some ideas that might complement yours, or stimulate other ideas for you.

There was a fair amount of detail and attention given to the debate activities in the Practice and the Production stages.  Reflect a little on why they were handled differently.  Another area of reflection is to consider having ‘dress rehearsals’ as an option for a final Practice activity.  What benefits are there to doing that, and what other factors might have to be considered (such as motivation, changes to be made, repetition, etc)?  And one last piece for food for thought.  A debate is a little complicated, but sometimes we teachers present complicated ideas, such as the structure for giving presentations, doing simulations or special kinds of role-plays / theater, playing some kinds of games, going over how exams are structured and evaluated, etc.  It’s good to take on the challenge of how to communicate something that involves much structure to students.  The teacher can play with how to approach it, like breaking it up into smaller components and deal with them over several different classes, for example.  All this has to be planned for and thought through as it takes shape in our lesson plans and attempts to meet certain objectives.  Once the structure is learned, we can more easily return to it when it can serve our purpose such as providing direction for how students can work on certain elements.

D.     A FEW FINAL WORDS

Congratulations on making it this far!

If you work in a situation where you have the flexibility (and the responsibility) to create your own lesson plans and not follow any particular model, then a very strong recommendation is to consider what aspects of different models (such as the PPP or PWP) you might be able to use in your class, without the obligation to try and make everything fit into that one model.  Let your perspectives of the class (what might be effective and most beneficial) along with the objectives and what is available (materials, technology, etc) be the defining criteria of how the lesson plan shapes up.  Maybe your goal is not to reach a Production stage, for example.  You want to introduce something complex and prefer to distribute the students’ orientation to it over a succession of classes and you plan on reaching the Production stage in the third or fourth class, depending on the students’ progress.  Sometimes you may want to dedicate only one or two activities and a short time to exploring some language aspect, and don’t want to go through all the different stages.  These and other decisions should override blindly following the PPP (or any other) model.  Some models have certain advantages (and disadvantages) and others have a different mixture.  And sometimes it’s best to step out of the box and do something that you feel is appropriate, even if it isn’t formally presented and labelled as a particular kind of approach or methodology.  To put all this in a nutshell, it’s good to see how applying the model can help bring you to where you want to go, and you should feel free to modify it so it better suits the situation as you see it.  That means that the methodology and the examples are not set in stone and depending on your criteria, you could come up with a very different version that might be more effective for your situation, or the situation you imagined.

I wish you all the best in your future journeys as you explore the possibilities of lesson planning, and the delivery of those plans in the classroom.